Practical Session Quality and Perceived Learning Outcomes in an ERP Odoo Point-of-Sale Practicum: An Empirical Study in Computerized Accounting Education

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.67955/bsij.v1i3.37

Keywords:

ERP education, practical session quality, perceived learning outcomes, Odoo Point-of-Sale, computerized accounting

Abstract

This study examines the relationship between practical session quality and perceived learning outcomes in an enterprise resource planning (ERP) Point-of-Sale (PoS) practicum using Odoo at Politeknik Negeri Semarang, Indonesia. A quantitative, cross-sectional design was employed using questionnaire data from 50 respondents. Practical session quality was assessed through indicators concerning the clarity of instructions, ease of following practical activities, independent operation of the PoS module, adequacy of practical-session time, and relevance of assigned tasks. Perceived learning outcomes were measured through students’ self-reported understanding of ERP concepts and PoS processes, ability to complete practical activities, and perceived achievement of learning objectives. The analysis used descriptive statistics, preliminary measurement assessments, standardized composite scores, and bootstrap resampling. The estimated association was positive but statistically nonsignificant (β = 0.103, p = 0.430). The model explained approximately 1.1% of the variance in perceived learning outcomes (R² = 0.011), indicating limited explanatory power for the specified predictor. An independently calculated heterotrait–monotrait ratio of 0.195 provided preliminary evidence of construct distinction. These findings do not imply that ERP practical sessions are ineffective; rather, they indicate that perceived practical-session quality alone did not explain students’ perceived learning outcomes in this sample. The study contributes an exploratory account of ERP-based learning in computerized accounting education and highlights the importance of combining student perceptions with objective assessments of practical competence. The findings are limited by the single-institution sample, cross-sectional design, self-reported measures, and composite-score analytical approach.

References

Alharbi, B. (2021). Development of an ERP System Design Course to Improve Students’ Learning Outcomes. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning (IJET), 16(12), 276–288. https://doi.org/10.3991/IJET.V16I12.22281

Alshare, K. A., Lane, P. L., Alshare, K. A., & Lane, P. L. (2011). Predicting Student-Perceived Learning Outcomes and Satisfaction in ERP Courses: An Empirical Investigation. Communications of the Association for Information Systems, 28(1), 34. https://doi.org/10.17705/1CAIS.02834

Aprilia, Z., Rahmasari, A., Naufal Fajri, A., Singaperbangsa Karawang, U., HSRonggo Waluyo, J., Timur, T., & Barat, J. (2025). Efektivitas Penggunaaan Teknologi Digital Dalam Pembelajaran Terhadap Proses Belajar Siswa Dibandingkan Dengan Metode Konvensional Di Smpn 6 Karawang Barat Wisam Maulana Iqbal Dhiaul Haq Lubis Khalid Ramdhani. JINU), 2(4), 470–481. https://doi.org/10.61722/jinu.v2i4.5097

Firmansyah, A. B. (2026). Eksplorasi Persepsi Mahasiswa Terhadap Penggunaan Teknologi Dalam Proses Pembelajaran. Jurnal Rumpun Manajemen Dan Ekonomi (JRME), 3, 14–28. https://doi.org/10.61722/jrme.v3i2.8881

Ghozali, I. & Fuad. 2008. Structural Equation Modeling. Semarang: Universitas Diponegoro.

Indra Firmansyah, B., Afrizaliyansyah, P., & Rizki Aflahul Muzhidin, M. (2026). Analisis Kepuasan Mahasiswa Terhadap Pembelajaran ERP dengan Software Odoo Pada Program Studi MTR. Jurnal PROCESSOR, 21(1). https://doi.org/10.33998/processor.2026.21.1.2668

Jewer, J., & Evermann, J. (2015). Enhancing Learning Outcomes through Experiential Learning: Using Open-Source Systems to Teach Enterprise Systems and Business Process Management. Journal of Information Systems Education, 26(3), 187.

Kolb, D. A. (1984). Experiential Learning: Experience As The Source Of Learning And Development Learning Sustainability View project How You Learn Is How You Live View project. http://www.learningfromexperience.com/images/uploads/process-of-experiential-learning.pdf!

Misnawati, I., Mus, A. R., & Bakri, A. A. (2025). Implementasi Enterprise Resource Planning (Erp) Terhadap Kinerja Pengguna Pada Perum Bulog Cabang Parepare. RIGGS: Journal of Artificial Intelligence and Digital Business, 4(2), 7061–7066. https://doi.org/10.31004/riggs.v4i2.1809

Morris, T. H. (2020). Experiential learning – a systematic review and revision of Kolb’s model. Interactive Learning Environments, 28(8), 1064–1077. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2019.1570279

Munir, M. S., Wulan, R., Wati, S. B., & Hidah, M. (2026). Transformasi Proses Bisnis melalui Implementasi ERP (Studi Kasus pada PT. Claff Visionworks Indonesia). RIGGS: Journal of Artificial Intelligence and Digital Business, 4(4), 12970–12976. https://doi.org/10.31004/riggs.v4i4.5534

Putri, A., Alfi, T., Jenderal, J., Yani, A., 111, N., Laut, B. B., Pontianak, K., Pontianak, T., Barat, K., & Kunci, K. (2025). Implementasi Odoo Erp Untuk Meningkatkan Efisiensi Pengelolaan Bisnis Pada Velvet Crumbs. 02(02), 7–11. https://doi.org/10.29406/cobit.v2i2.8778

Ramadita, R., Putri, L., Rustam Herosuma, A., Amalia, M., Digital, P. B., Ekonomi, F., Bisnis, D., Swadharma, I., & Akuntansi, P. (2025). Analisis Penerapan Sistem Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) Dalam Berbagai Industri: Perspektif Manajemen dan Organisasi.

Rienzo, T., & Han, B. (2011). Does ERP Hands-On Experience Help Students Learning Business Process Concepts? Decision Sciences Journal of Innovative Education, 9(2), 177–207. https://doi.org/10.1111/J.1540-4609.2011.00300.

Sugiyono. (2013). Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif dan R&D. Bandung: Alfabeta.

Downloads

Published

2026-11-01

How to Cite

Ulfah, R., Yunistiyani, V., & Sarana, S. (2026). Practical Session Quality and Perceived Learning Outcomes in an ERP Odoo Point-of-Sale Practicum: An Empirical Study in Computerized Accounting Education. Business System & Innovation Journal, 1(3), 159-173. https://doi.org/10.67955/bsij.v1i3.37