From Compliance to Responsible AI: A Bibliometric Study on Educational Data Governance and Student Privacy (2015-2025)
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.67955/bsij.v1i3.29Keywords:
educational data governance, student privacy, learning analytics, GDPR, online proctoringAbstract
This study maps the development of research on educational data governance and student privacy between 2015 and 2025. It follows the structure of a bibliometric trend review and uses a Scopus-derived record set of 313 articles to analyze the analytical workflow, including annual output, keyword co-occurrence, thematic evolution, policy turning points, and research collaboration. The study is guided by three questions: how the volume of research changed, how the dominant vocabulary moved from learning analytics and ownership to compliance and responsible artificial intelligence, and which problems remained unresolved across the period. The results show five connected phases. From 2015 to 2017, research was organized around learning analytics, educational data mining, student tracking, data ownership, and informed consent. After the General Data Protection Regulation became applicable on May 25, 2018, the literature moved toward data protection, compliance, governance frameworks, and institutional responsibility. The COVID-19 period increased attention to remote learning privacy, online proctoring, surveillance, and vendor data sharing. From late 2022, generative artificial intelligence, ChatGPT, algorithmic bias, ethical artificial intelligence, and artificial intelligence literacy became central. The 2024-2025 frontier connected responsible artificial intelligence with high-risk education systems, human oversight, auditability, and data minimization in large language models. The study argues that compliance is necessary but insufficient. A mature governance model must connect legal duties, institutional processes, technical controls, and educational judgment.
References
Aria, M., & Cuccurullo, C. (2017). bibliometrix: An R-tool for comprehensive science mapping analysis. Journal of Informetrics, 11(4), 959-975. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2017.08.007
Bender, E. M., Gebru, T., McMillan-Major, A., & Shmitchell, S. (2021). On the dangers of stochastic parrots: Can language models be too big? Proceedings of the 2021 ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency, 610-623. https://doi.org/10.1145/3442188.3445922
Barocas, S., & Selbst, A. D. (2016). Big data's disparate impact. California Law Review, 104(3), 671-732. https://doi.org/10.15779/Z38BG31
Buolamwini, J., & Gebru, T. (2018). Gender shades: Intersectional accuracy disparities in commercial gender classification. Proceedings of Machine Learning Research, 81, 77-91. https://doi.org/10.1145/3216351.3216369
Chen, C. (2006). CiteSpace II: Detecting and visualizing emerging trends and transient patterns in scientific literature. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 57(3), 359-377. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.20317
Cormack, A. N. (2016). A data protection framework for learning analytics. Journal of Learning Analytics, 3(1), 91–106. https://doi.org/10.18608/jla.2016.31.6
Crawford, K., & Boyd, D. (2012). Critical questions for big data. Information, Communication & Society, 15(5), 662-679. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2012.678878
Drachsler, H., & Greller, W. (2016). Privacy and analytics: It's a DELICATE issue. A checklist for trusted learning analytics. Journal of Learning Analytics, 3(3), 89–106. https://doi.org/10.18608/jla.2016.33.7
Crompton, H., & Burke, D. (2023). Artificial intelligence in higher education: The state of the field. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 20, Article 22. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-023-00392-8
Donthu, N., Kumar, S., Mukherjee, D., Pandey, N., & Lim, W. M. (2021). How to conduct a bibliometric analysis: An overview and guidelines. Journal of Business Research, 133, 285-296. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.04.070
European Commission High-Level Expert Group on Artificial Intelligence. (2019). Ethics guidelines for trustworthy AI. European Commission.
European Data Protection Board. (2022). Guidelines 05/2022 on the use of facial recognition technology in the area of law enforcement. European Union.
European Parliament and Council of the European Union. (2016). Regulation (EU) 2016/679 of the European Parliament and of the Council. Official Journal of the European Union. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/reg/2016/679/oj
European Parliament and Council of the European Union. (2024). Regulation (EU) 2024/1689 laying down harmonised rules on artificial intelligence. Official Journal of the European Union. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/reg/2024/1689/oj
Eubanks, V. (2018). Automating inequality: How high-tech tools profile, police, and punish the poor. St. Martin's Press.
Ferguson, R. (2012). The state of learning analytics in 2012: A review and future challenges (Technical Report KMI-12-01). Knowledge Media Institute, The Open University.
Floridi, L., Cowls, J., Beltrametti, M., Chatila, R., Chazerand, P., Dignum, V., Luetge, C., Madelin, R., Pagallo, U., Rossi, F., Schafer, B., Valcke, P., & Vayena, E. (2018). AI4People: An ethical framework for a good AI society. Minds and Machines, 28, 689-707. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11023-018-9482-5
Floridi, L., & Cowls, J. (2019). A unified framework of five principles for AI in society. Harvard Data Science Review, 1(1). https://doi.org/10.1162/99608f92.8cd550d1
Gašević, D., Dawson, S., & Siemens, G. (2015). Let's not forget: Learning analytics are about learning. TechTrends, 59(1), 64–71. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-014-0822-x
Ifenthaler, D., & Schumacher, C. (2016). Student perceptions of privacy principles for learning analytics. Educational Technology Research and Development, 64, 923-938. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-016-9477-y
Jobin, A., Ienca, M., & Vayena, E. (2019). The global landscape of AI ethics guidelines. Nature Machine Intelligence, 1, 389-399. https://doi.org/10.1038/s42256-019-0088-2
Kasneci, E., Sessler, K., Küchemann, S., Bannert, M., Dementieva, D., Fischer, F., Gasser, U., Groh, G., Günnemann, S., Hüllermeier, E., Krusche, S., Kutyniok, G., Michaeli, T., Nerdel, C., Pfeiffer, F., Poquet, O., Sailer, M., Schmidt, A., Seidel, T., Stadler, M., & Kasneci, G. (2023). ChatGPT for good? On opportunities and challenges of large language models for education. Learning and Individual Differences, 103, 102274.
Kitchin, R. (2014). Big data, new epistemologies and paradigm shifts. Big Data & Society, 1(1), 1-12.
Mittelstadt, B. (2019). Principles alone cannot guarantee ethical AI. Nature Machine Intelligence, 1, 501–507. https://doi.org/10.1038/s42256-019-0114-4
National Institute of Standards and Technology. (2023). Artificial intelligence risk management framework AI RMF 1.0. U.S. Department of Commerce. https://doi.org/10.6028/NIST.AI.100-1
Nissenbaum, H. (2004). Privacy as contextual integrity. Washington Law Review, 79(1), 119-158.
Office of Educational Technology. (2023). Artificial intelligence and the future of teaching and learning: Insights and recommendations. U.S. Department of Education.
Pardo, A., & Siemens, G. (2014). Ethical and privacy principles for learning analytics. British Journal of Educational Technology, 45(3), 438-450. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12152
Prinsloo, P., & Slade, S. (2016). Student vulnerability, agency, and learning analytics: An exploration. Journal of Learning Analytics, 3(1), 159–182. https://doi.org/10.18608/jla.2016.31.10
Romero, C., & Ventura, S. (2020). Educational data mining and learning analytics: An updated survey. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery, 10(3), e1355. https://doi.org/10.1002/widm.1355
Selbst, A. D., Boyd, D., Friedler, S. A., Venkatasubramanian, S., & Vertesi, J. (2019). Fairness and abstraction in sociotechnical systems. Proceedings of the Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency, 59-68. https://doi.org/10.1145/3287560.3287598
Siemens, G., & Long, P. (2011). Penetrating the fog: Analytics in learning and education. EDUCAUSE Review, 46(5), 30-40. https://doi.org/10.1145/2090116.2090118
Slade, S., & Prinsloo, P. (2013). Learning analytics: Ethical issues and dilemmas. American Behavioral Scientist, 57(10), 1510-1529. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002764213479366
Tsai, Y. S., Whitelock-Wainwright, A., & Gašević, D. (2020). The privacy paradox and its implications for learning analytics. In LAK '20: Proceedings of the Tenth International Conference on Learning Analytics and Knowledge (pp. 230–239). Association for Computing Machinery. https://doi.org/10.1145/3375462.3375536
UNESCO. (2021). Recommendation on the ethics of artificial intelligence. United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization.
UNESCO. (2023). Guidance for generative AI in education and research. United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization.
U.S. Department of Education. (2024). Family Educational Rights and Privacy Act FERPA. https://studentprivacy.ed.gov/ferpa
van Eck, N. J., & Waltman, L. (2010). Software survey: VOSviewer, a computer program for bibliometric mapping. Scientometrics, 84, 523-538. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-009-0146-3
Williamson, B., & Eynon, R. (2020). Historical threads, missing links, and future directions in AI in education. Learning, Media and Technology, 45(3), 223-235. https://doi.org/10.1080/17439884.2020.1736283
Wu, Y. (2025). Integrating Artificial Intelligence into Education: Opportunities, Challenges, and Response Strategies. Al Innovations and Applications, 1(1), 115-124. https://doi.org/10.63944/sj51.AIA
Zawacki-Richter, O., Marín, V. I., Bond, M., & Gouverneur, F. (2019). Systematic review of research on artificial intelligence applications in higher education: Where are the educators? International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 16, Article 39. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-019-0171-0
Zupic, I., & Cater, T. (2015). Bibliometric methods in management and organization. Organizational Research Methods, 18(3), 429-472. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428114562629
Alfredo, R., Echeverria, V., Jin, Y., Yan, L., Swiecki, Z., Gašević, D., & Martinez-Maldonado, R. (2024). Human-centred learning analytics and AI in education: A systematic literature review. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 6, 100215. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2024.100215
Tubella, A. A., Mora-Cantallops, M., & Nieves, J. C. (2024). How to teach responsible AI in higher education: Challenges and opportunities. Ethics and Information Technology, 26, 3. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10676-023-09733-7
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Ying Chen, Ruofan Lin, Weijian Kong, Yundong Wu, Shun Guo, Jiani Wu, Tingting Lv, Yuxuan Chen (Author)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
